Another interesting comment!

First, I suggest everyone to check Fox News. It is highly informative, in that, it teaches you how one-sided a group can become under strict monetary relationships and pressure.

Now, the comment that I was supposed to comment on is from UN Ambassador of Israel. He first said that the civilian people that are killed by Israel's intentional or accidental(!) (for instance 10-day old or a few months old babies *) had deserved to die if they helped Hizbullah. Then, he said that, I guess to save himself, those people were forced to help Hizbullah. An interesting turn. But, again, he didn't change his opinion, meaning that they again deserve to die.

Israel is doing what they criticized to be done more than 50 years ago. Attacking and killing civilians with no actual evidence and justifying reason. And in a way, they somewhat justify what the other terrorist organizations in that region are doing all along, which is along the lines of "If a person is found to directly help an enemy, even if that person is a civilian, then they deserve to die". Now, according to those organizations Israel is considered as enemy. If you think further, you reach a sickening conclusion. But I would like to ask you, on the basis, is this really much different than what Israel is doing right now?

* Just enter the websites of news organizations that are not directly controlled by people in blind-support of Israel - European news agencies for instance - , you will find unbiased information and see a few interesting pictures from that region that you cannot find on MSNBC, Foxnews, or similar sites.